Necessary Man
The Necessary Man argues that Petr Chaadaev (1794–1856), a prototype for some of the most famous protagonists of nineteenth-century Russian literature, is less important for his philosophy than for his persona and the emotional resistance to political authority that he introduced into society. Ingrid Anne Kleespies reveals how Chaadaev's persona articulated key concerns of the age, offering a new perspective on Decembrist-era liberal elites caught between East and West. Kleespies examines the link between politics and emotion, the rise of celebrity culture, and the relationship between media representation and the self—phenomena that remain preoccupations today.
The Necessary Man examines an emotional template that was central to the age of revolutions and democratization in Europe yet has not been considered in the Russian context: political contempt. Looking at individual writers such as Alexander Herzen and Fyodor Dostoevsky, Kleespies explores the relationship between Chaadaev and his literary avatars, considering how the process of literary characterization in his lifetime intersected with his real behavior, and how this interaction itself shaped the reception of Chaadaev in the decades to come.
Original: $149.81
-65%$149.81
$52.43Description
The Necessary Man argues that Petr Chaadaev (1794–1856), a prototype for some of the most famous protagonists of nineteenth-century Russian literature, is less important for his philosophy than for his persona and the emotional resistance to political authority that he introduced into society. Ingrid Anne Kleespies reveals how Chaadaev's persona articulated key concerns of the age, offering a new perspective on Decembrist-era liberal elites caught between East and West. Kleespies examines the link between politics and emotion, the rise of celebrity culture, and the relationship between media representation and the self—phenomena that remain preoccupations today.
The Necessary Man examines an emotional template that was central to the age of revolutions and democratization in Europe yet has not been considered in the Russian context: political contempt. Looking at individual writers such as Alexander Herzen and Fyodor Dostoevsky, Kleespies explores the relationship between Chaadaev and his literary avatars, considering how the process of literary characterization in his lifetime intersected with his real behavior, and how this interaction itself shaped the reception of Chaadaev in the decades to come.
